Reuse of material in the context of education and research
De Framalang Wiki.
Article original sur [ http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090706surfcc_reuse_materiaal_def.pdf ].
| Pseudo | Code | Rôle | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyah | TYA | Traduction | Terminée |
| Cheval_boiteux | QT | Relecture | Terminée |
| Validation | |||
| Mise en forme |
Sommaire |
Titre
Reuse of material in the context of education and research
SummaryRéutilisation du matériel dans le contexte de l'éducation et de la recherche.
RésuméParagraphe 1
Sharing educational and research materials is high on the agenda of Dutch higher education and research institutions. It must be possible to use and reuse materials produced or collected at the institutions for educational and research purposes, or as the basis for the development of new materials.
Paragraphe 2
The rise of the Internet and other new ICT tools have led to drastic changes in the options for distribution and reuse. These changes demand a reorientation in the rules for sharing educational and research materials.
Paragraphe 3
In this study report, Creative Commons Netherlands and SURFdirect (SURF’s Digital Rights Expertise Community) produce recommendations for a licence for sharing such materials within the context of higher education in the Netherlands. This concerns a licence that will make clear to reusers what they are permitted to do with material held in repositories. Various different Open Content licences exist for this, for example the Creative Commons licences. It is not only for the reuse of content that licences have been developed; they have also been formulated over the past
two years for sharing scientific/scholarly data that take account of the specific features of scientific and scholarly research data.
Paragraphe 4
An exploratory survey by SURFdirect and Creative Commons Netherlands has shown that educators wish to be able to share educational and research material but that there are currently no appropriate guidelines. At international level, there have been initiatives in the past few years focusing on international standards for free access to scientific and scholarly publications (Berlin Declaration on Open Access), educational material (Cape Town Open Education Declaration), and scientific/scholarly research data (Science Commons Protocol for
Implementing Open Access Data). These guidelines and declarations outline the minimum requirements for recommending a licence for reuse of content and raw research data.Une étude de SURFdirect et de Creative Commons Netherlands a montré que les acteurs de l'éducation aimeraient avoir la possibilité de partager le matériel de recherche et éducatif mais qu'il n'y a actuellement aucun guidage approprié. Au niveau international, il y a eu des initiatives ces dernières années dans le but de developper des standarts internationaux pour un accès libre aux publications scientifiques et éducatifs (Déclaration de Berlin sur le libre-accès), le matériel éducatif (Déclaration de Cape Town sur l'Open-éducation) et sur les données de recherche scientifique/scolaires (Protocole Scientifique Commun pour l'implementation de données en libre accès). Ces déclarations de principes soulignent le minimum requis pour la recommandation d'une licence dans le but d'aider à la réutilisation d'un contenu et des données de recherche.
Paragraphe 5
In the light of the analysis of existing Open Content licences in the fourth section of this report, it has been concluded that the Creative Commons licences do in fact comply with these minimum requirements. At the moment, they are the most frequently used and most user-friendly Open Content licences. They have a solid metadata implementation and, unlike all other Open Content licences, are also available in versions tailored to Dutch copyright legislation. There are six different versions of the Creative Commons licences. In addition to the required attribution, five of them apply supplementary restrictions regarding the use of licensed material for commercial purposes and/or the production of derivative works. Not permitting commercial reuse or the creation of derivative works would seem at first sight to comply with the wishes expressed by those in the field. These are not, however in line with the relevant international
standards and also do not correspond with SURFdirect’s basic principles as referred to below.Paragraphe 6
Given SURFdirect’s requirement that the choice of licence must not create barriers to the future use of educational and research material, that it can be applied at both research universities and universities of applied sciences [hogescholen], and that this can in fact be done in 80% of cases,
this report recommends using the most liberal Creative Commons licence for textual output:Paragraphe 7
On the basis of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Netherlands Licence, users of the licensed work are permitted to copy it, distribute it, and pass it on, and produce derivative works and distribute them on condition that the work is attributed to its author. This licence
freely permits commercial use and derivative works as long as users comply with the requirements regarding attribution. These comprise not only giving the name of the author but also the obligation to clearly designate derivative works as such.Paragraphe 8
Licensing of raw research data forms an exception to this recommendation. At the moment, the Open Data licences that were reviewed are only available in draft form, meaning that it is not yet possible to make any definite recommendations regarding a specific licence. The definitive choice of
a licence for licensing research data must in any case comply, however, with the “Science Commons Protocol for Implementing Open Access Data”.
